Let us help you sell, rent or buy your property. Join us at Facebook.comJoin us at Facebook.comFollow us at twitter.com
Let us help you sell, rent or buy your property.  

Buying Property

Take a medium term view

Wednesday, June 15th, 2011

The constant debate about whether there is a bubble in the local housing market and if it has burst consistently fails to take into account the long term performance of the real estate market.

Some commentators, often with an air of expectation who use statistics to suggest an imminent collapse, need to take a longer-term view and look beyond what happened in the market last weekend or last month.

Like any broad-based market reliant upon the participation of thousands of people each  week, it will be bound to fluctuate over the short term, but due to most households wealth being  in housing and the fact that most people only buy and sell infrequently, what really matters is the medium to long term performance.

A review of the performance of the market over the past decade indicates that the only time that prices  fell  significantly was during the Global financial crisis, the reasons for the drop of around $70,000 in the median house price between 2008 and 2009 are well known and home owners and investors should be pleased that once local economic conditions improved so, too, did the market.

The alternative would not be welcomed by anyone. In the same way, as rapid increases in value are unsustainable and ultimately not positive for the economy so, too, are substantial falls.

If prices fell strongly and remained low then many home owners and investors would face the scenario of negative equity, increases in mortgagee sales and investors leaving the market.

There is no doubt the residential market is different now to what it was last year with lower price growth expected and less transactions undertaken, however it does present opportunities for those who are in a position to buy.

A review of the residential market which each year in Victoria turns over approximately $70 billion from about 150,000 transactions will show that is based on solid fundamentals and has provided reasonable capital growth over the last decade.

Warwick Brookes – 0412 340 611

Buyers Advocate

Domain Property Advocates

www.warwickbrookes.com.au

Population growth and housing issues

Wednesday, June 15th, 2011

Accomodating our growing population is one of our community’s most pressing concerns.

This was highlighted in a recent report by the Productivity Commission, in which Australians were surveyed about attitudes to population growth and the increased density required to house it.

The report found that the majority of Australians indicated that they would not like increased population. In Melbourne, 52 per cent said they would not like it, while a mere 11 per cent said they would.

The reasons behind the resistance to higher population were not surprising: 86 per cent said increased traffic congestion was the main reason, followed by increased noise and loss of street appeal. Shadows from higher buildings and decreased property values were also cited as a problem.

Conversely, those who were in favour of increased population cited increased property values, improved services and more vibrant suburbs as positive factors.

It’s fascinating that on both sides of the debate, property values are an issue.

While not included in the survey, the message is clear that most people do not want to see housing affordability further reduced.

Those surveyed were also asked to rate different types of development, indicating which of five different variants they most favoured. The least popular form was ‘multiple dwellings replacing single dwellings’ (basically infill development), which 53 per cent of those surveyed opposed; compare this to the much more favourable rating given to ‘residential development in a new area’, which was only opposed by 29 per cent.

The problem for our community and its decision makers is that none of these factors adds up to a solution.

Opposition to infill development is in part why the cost of infill development is higher and the preference given to ‘greenfields’ development results in higher costs for government in the form of more roads and public transport.

Given that the inability to provide enough homes is the main cause of reduced affordability, solving this issue will also provide the keys to improved housing affordability

Warwick Brookes – 0412 340 611

Buyers Advocate

Domain Property Advocates

www.warwickbrookes.com.au

Top 20 suburbs for captial growth (Houses) over 10 years

Wednesday, June 15th, 2011

In the past 10 years, the largest increases in median house prices have, with a few exceptions, been found in the inner eastern suburbs.
 

Kew, Malvern East, Balwyn, Canterbury, Hawthorn, Hawthorn East, Caulfield South and Armadale have all seen their median increase by between 200 and 300 per cent in 10 years, all reaching one million dollars. This again confirms the desirability of these suburbs from an investment and livability perspective.
 

However, the exceptions are interesting and explain a lot about what has changed in the Melbourne residential property market.
Within the top 20, those that are not in the east are Ivanhoe, Strathmore, Footscray, Sunshine, St Kilda East, Reservoir, Keilor East and Mordialloc. In those suburbs owners have seen values also increase by between 270 and 300 per cent.
 

Median house prices in Ivanhoe, St Kilda and Strathmore are all valued at around one million dollars, while the others are priced at or around the median, showing that strong capital growth is not confined to the inner east or bayside suburbs.
 

Footscray is the standout suburb, with an increase of 246 per cent in 10 years. This is more than double the Melbourne house median of 109 per cent in that time. Similarly strong demand can be found in nearby Sunshine, where the median has increased by 208 per cent.

These suburbs share one thing in common with the traditionally popular inner east: proximity to the CBD.  This is an important factor that owner–occupiers and investors should keep in mind when buying.
 

Area

Change

2011_Q1 Median

2001_Q1 Median

Kew

366%

 $ 1,945,000

 $            417,500

Malvern East

297%

 $ 1,477,500

 $            372,500

Ivanhoe

271%

 $ 1,280,000

 $            345,200

Balwyn

257%

 $ 1,475,000

 $            413,000

Strathmore

252%

 $ 922,000

 $            261,625

Canterbury

250%

 $ 1,845,500

 $            527,000

Hawthorn

250%

 $ 1,427,000

 $            408,000

Footscray

246%

 $ 650,000

 $            188,000

Hawthorn East

211%

 $ 1,360,000

 $            437,500

Caulfield South

210%

 $ 1,008,000

 $            325,000

Sunshine

208%

 $ 447,500

 $            145,500

St Kilda East

207%

 $ 1,060,000

 $            345,000

Blackburn

206%

 $ 903,750

 $            295,500

Armadale

206%

 $ 1,780,000

 $            582,250

Glen Waverley

206%

 $ 733,400

 $            240,000

Reservoir

205%

 $ 548,750

 $            180,000

Keilor East

204%

 $ 640,000

 $            210,200

Mordialloc

202%

 $ 662,500

 $            219,500

Murrumbeena

201%

 $ 903,500

 $            300,000

Burwood

199%

 $ 800,000

 $            268,000

Melbourne Metro

109%

 $ 565,000

 $            270,000

Warwick Brookes – 0412 340 611

Buyers Advocate

Domain Property Advocates

www.warwickbrookes.com.au

New National Housing Supply Council Appointments

Wednesday, June 15th, 2011

The recent announcement by the Federal Government that the National Housing Supply Council has been reformed with new members is good news for all involved in the buying, selling and construction of homes.

The National Housing Supply Council was established by the government in 2008 as an independent body to provide forecasts, analysis and advice on land supply and construction activity to meet housing demand and improve affordability over a 20-year forecast period.

Its work helps inform the weekly discussion about the balance between supply and demand, particularly helping to explain and understand one of the key drivers of housing affordability.

In its last report, it stated that Victoria had a supply shortage of 22,700 homes in 2009. This has been cited as a key reason for the steep rise in house prices and rental costs in the past few years.

The report also noted that it cost less to develop a dwelling in a greenfields area than it does in an infill one. An average infill dwelling costs $489,523; in a greenfields area, it’s $374,756. This obviously influences the cost and delivery of homes across the city.
This information is very useful for the real estate industry, related professions and decision makers within local, state and federal governments.

The Council continues to be chaired by Dr Owen Donald and retains the services of Saul Eslake. They are joined on the Council by a range of well qualified people from academia and the finance, economics, building, planning and urban development sectors.

The Council’s priority is to develop and deliver the third State of Supply Report which is expected later this year

Warwick Brookes – 0412 340 611

Buyers Advocate

Domain Property Advocates

www.warwickbrookes.com.au

Denser is better, say planners

Friday, April 29th, 2011
Jason Dowling

April 29, 2011

The number of houses on each hectare of Melbourne’s newest suburbs must double if shops and services within walking distance are to be viable, according to new research.

If housing density in growth areas does not increase, the city was ”building to fail”, a leading planning academic has warned.

Building guidelines call for 15 homes a hectare in Melbourne’s growth areas, but research by urban designers SJB Urban shows it is not enough to make even a small local shopping centre or corner shop within walking distance viable.

The report Shall we Dense? calls for new suburbs to have an average of 25 to 30 dwellings a hectare by providing a better mix of housing, including townhouses and apartments.

Report co-author and urban designer Simon McPherson said 15 houses a hectare would mean the loss of more than local shops.

”That lack of viability then extends to other types of centres and facilities,” Mr McPherson said. ”It is not just retail, it is community facilities, it is public transport.”

The researchers used published economic data to determine the number of people required to make services viable then calculated the number of houses for the necessary population.

The report said 15 houses a hectare translated to about 510 dwellings within walking distance of shops and services or ”just over half of the required population to support the centre’s viability and sustainability”.

The research, to be delivered to the World Sustainable Building Conference in Helsinki in October, argues people need services close by to encourage walking and patronage.

”Beyond five to 10 minutes’ walk, the behavioural tendency is to opt for car use, and then to potentially bypass local centres to travel further to larger centres,” it found.

Planning Minister Matthew Guy rejected the call for much greater housing density in Melbourne’s growth areas.

”The Victorian Coalition government does not accept the assumption put forward by SJB Urban that 26 houses per hectare is the minimum required to attract services,” he said.

”The government believes there is merit in developments with varying densities, and that services can be provided to these developments.”

The associate professor of urban planning at RMIT University, Michael Buxton, said Melbourne was building to fail with its low housing density in growth areas. ”We are building suburbs in the fringe that can’t support services,” he said.

”It’s world’s-worst-standard subdivision, single-use suburbs at relatively low density without any hope of adequate services.”

He said Melbourne probably needed to increase housing density between ”two or three times what we are doing in the outer fringe areas”.


LATEST UPDATES

View the latest industry trends and local news in real estate.

Ten years ago

Friday, November 25th, 2011

Jason Dowling April 29, 2011 The number of houses on each hectare of Melbourne’s newest suburbs must double if shops and services within walking distance are to be viable, according to new research. If housing density in growth areas does not increase, the city was ”building to fail”, a leading planning academic has warned. Building [...]

learn more

Buyers agents

Friday, November 25th, 2011

Jason Dowling April 29, 2011 The number of houses on each hectare of Melbourne’s newest suburbs must double if shops and services within walking distance are to be viable, according to new research. If housing density in growth areas does not increase, the city was ”building to fail”, a leading planning academic has warned. Building [...]

learn more

Less time to pay stamp duty

Friday, November 25th, 2011

Jason Dowling April 29, 2011 The number of houses on each hectare of Melbourne’s newest suburbs must double if shops and services within walking distance are to be viable, according to new research. If housing density in growth areas does not increase, the city was ”building to fail”, a leading planning academic has warned. Building [...]

learn more

THE VALUE OF ADVOCACY, WE’LL SAVE YOU PLENTY !!

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011

As is the case in many businesses, occasionally, we are challenged or questioned about the fees we earn. If I could tell you how to save tens of thousands of $$$ and more, would you believe me ? Before I answer this question let me start by giving you an analygy.

learn more

Register Now

to let Domain Property Advocates help you.

Other Advisors

The team at Domain Property Advocates will put our experience, knowledge and attention to detail to work for you.
Warwick Brookes Melanie Dennis David McMillan Nicki Macrae Rob Millar
Warwick Brookes Melanie Dennis David McMillan Nicki Macrae Rob Millar